One Flew Over The Cuckoo`s Nest Essays (1062 words) -

One Flew Over The Cuckoo`s Nest When a person reads the novel One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest, by Ken Kesey, they are taking a different look at the corrupt side of society through the eyes of this intelligent and imaginative author. Kesey leads the reader through a mental hospital in the form of a mentally ill patient called ?Chief' Bromden. Throughout the story the reader is shown a darker side of what is traditionally labeled as good or necessary, namely the hospital, in our culture. It is shown how one good force can have such an extreme effect on the fate of it's opposition. In this particular story the good force is a man by the name of Randall P. McMurphy. He comes into the ward and creates a disruption to all that is ordinary and accepted. The story One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest explores the idea that McMurphy is a Christ-like figure, and that there is an underlying battle between good (McMurphy) and evil (Big Nurse) that seriously affects the outcome of the patients in the ward. One thing that allows the reader to enter into the idea that McMurphy is quite special is how he was noticeably different from all the other patients at the beginning of the story. He had a much greater crave for independence and things like self-gratification than did any of the others. He states that he is "thinking of taking over the whole show himself" (Kesey 22) right at the beginning of the story. This is something none of the other patients would ever even consider saying, and they become very interested in him immediately. After McMurphy starts getting to know the other people in the ward, he builds a bond with them and starts to express a feeling of wanting to make things change. This is where his stronger Christ-like qualities begin to shine through. He can relate to Christ not only because "He and Christ could function in their societies, but they were able to edify those who followed them and bring meaning into once futile lives" (Essay 2). According to one essay: Both McMurphy and Christ were charismatic and had a small devote following. Christ often challenged the Jewish ritualization of the law and blamed the scribes and Pharisees, with power, for being hypocrites. In this same manner, R.P. McMurphy often caused a stir by confronting the system of the asylum and it's authorities. (2) This is only one of the many similarities between the two very important men. One could go as far as to relate the fishing trip in the story to the actual assumed profession of Jesus Christ himself, that of a fisherman. Perhaps the most unifying similarity between Christ and McMurphy is the action of sacrificing themselves for their causes. They are both killed by their own people. Christ is killed by the Jews, and McMurphy by Mr. Bromden, both for a good cause. Both men have interesting life stories that end with martyrdom and salvation for others. In some words "Finally, the eventual death of McMurphy was Chief's "new birth." McMurphy died in place of Chief, and liberation ensued. The same parallel exists among those who identify themselves with Christ, his death, and resurrection. This was the way to salvation or liberation from the confinement of a worthless life" (Essay 2). The presence of a Christ-like protagonist leads the story to take on the basis of a battle between good and evil. In this basic frame of good and evil, Big Nurse, otherwise known as Nurse Ratched takes on the role of the evil force. She is hurtful toward the patients and is always making certain that her power and authority over the patients aren't questioned or jeopardized in any way. A perfect example of her hurtful behavior is the downsizing of Billy Bibbit, a patient in the ward, after he has sex with a woman, which proves to be extremely therapeutic for his condition. Her verbal assault drives the boy to the point of suicide within minutes. The good force, performed by McMurphy, is very helpful to them. When he brings the whole group out on a fishing trip without ward permission the guys get their first real taste of freedom in a long time. The whole trip ends up being so much fun, that almost all of the patients seem one hundred percent better. This makes no difference to the nurse. She quickly scolds them, fighting to be powerful, and accuses McMurphy of being a danger to the

Would You Write Daily If You Got Paid For It

Would You Write Daily If You Got Paid For It A new UK company has launched offering aspiring novelists an alternative to publication: a salary from  £2,000 per month to write novels. De Montfort Literature (DML) will pay writers a salary to write novels which DML will then design, print, publish and promote. After salary, production and marketing costs, authors will receive a 50 percent share of the book sale profits. https://www.thebookseller.com/news/start-publishing-venture-offer-aspiring-novelists-salary-793601 Imagine having to report to work every day, sit at your desk, and produce a certain amount of work. To earn a full-time writing income, you have to write full-time. A lot of people dont like that. They think the rigorous schedule takes the fun out of writing. Well, guess what? When a hob Write every day. You get better. You get stronger. You get faster. You build confidence. You become dependable. You get to the point that whenever your butt hits the chair, your brain kicks into gear and your fingers itch to write. Its called habit. Its teaching your body what to instinctively do. And it makes a mockery out of writers block. Most authors are afraid to write daily. Those who arent, are the ones making more money. Doesnt that just make perfect sense?

Auteur Theory and Directorial Burlesque Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 words

Auteur Theory and Directorial Burlesque - Essay Example In the domain of cinematic extravaganza directorial role evolves as â€Å"consequential volume of discourse on a ?lm’s director and on consecration itself† (Hicks & Petrova, 2006, p. 180). The emergence of the auteur theory circumscribes around the role of the director in a movie. The auteur theory is actually a way of reading or the appraisal of the films through the indentation of an auteur (author) especially the director. The underlying mechanism of the theory states that quality of a film centers around the director as author. The paper will deal with the crux of the auteur theory with reference to a reputed director of Hollywood, M. Night Syamalan and his great works in the field of cinema. Auteur theory Developments and the proponents Historically, the notion of the authorship developed the essence of a secluded individual working fervently for the creation of the bodies of art. As for example the characters in Baz Luhrmann’s Moulin Rouge, there have been a perfect permeation of the romantic stereotype of the tortured Bohemian artist. The term auteur is basically a French word and the word prefixed with it i.e, ‘auoto’ means one. ... In one of the two comparative popular history texts of the recent origin, Nowell-Smith, Sarris and Bogdanovitchare are mentioned. In 2004, the ISI Web of Science Citation Indexes for the arts and the social sciences figured out that Sarris, The American Cinema was cited around 100 times while on the other hand, Truffaut’s phenomenal ‘Politiques des auteurs’ was only cited 12 times (Hicks & Petrova, 2006, p.184). . The notion of the theory The theme of the theory conjectures upon the fact that the director of a film with his or her personal influences and artistic control over their films are so immense and charismatic that the director may be regarded as the their author and their films are recognized collectively as cluster of work sharing common notion or the ambience spread expresses the rigid predominance of the an individual’s style or vision (Auteur Theory, n.d., p. 3). The theory finds its roots of development of the influential essay written by Fran cois Truffaut in Cahiers du Cinema in 1954. The auteur theory differs from the straightforward theory of directors which could be found from Ian Cameron’s article â€Å"Films, Directors, and Critics†, in Movie of September, 1962 where the comment he made goes as follows: â€Å"The assumptions that underlies all the writing in the Movie is that the director is the author of the film, the person who gives it any distinctive quality. The significant premise on which the theory stands is the distinguishable personality of the director as a criterion of the value. Over through a wide array of films, the director wills exposit certain characteristics of style which will be represented as the signature of the director. The way in which the storyline of the movie flows largely depends on the thinking and